Статьи

POLITICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES OF FORMING INTER-BUDGETARY RELATIONS

Received: 03.03.2025 Accepted: 11.03.2025 Published: 15.01.2025

DOI: 10.22394/1997-4469-2025-68-1-99-105

Full text

Abstract

The relevance of the topic. Recently, the sphere of inter-budgetary relations has become particularly important in the process of shaping the country's economic situation. The presented paper provides an overview of scientific research on budgetary decentralization and inter-budgetary relations in the process of improving the efficiency of the economic system through the use of political, economic and administrative advantages. Special attention is paid to the analysis of existing opportunities for decentralizing inter-budgetary relations and their impact on the economic development of the country. The theoretical concepts of inter-budgetary relations are investigated in order to eliminate economic inequality in the context of the regional structure of the country. Goal. An empirical study of the existing possibilities of fiscal decentralization in the process of improving the efficiency of the country's economy. Methodology. The research was based on methods of analysis and comparison, as well as graphical and logical methods. The information and analytical base of the study was made up of regulatory documents, materials from periodicals devoted to the study of the existing advantages of budgetary decentralization in economic management, and other sources. Results and conclusions. The theoretical concepts of inter-budgetary relations are investigated and systematized, the existing advantages and limitations of their formation using decentralization are analyzed. The scope of application. When developing strategic management documents at the regional and federal levels.

Keywords

Received: 3 March 2025 · Accepted: 11 March 2025

How to cite

Для цитирования:

Серебрякова Н.А., Петров Д.С., Соломатина Е.Д., и др. ПОЛИТИКО-АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫЕ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА ФОРМИРОВАНИЯ МЕЖБЮДЖЕТНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ // Регион: системы, экономика, управление. 2025. Т. 1, № 1 (68). С. 99–105. https://doi.org/10.22394/1997-4469-2025-68-1-99-105

For citation:

Serebryakova N.A., Petrov D.S., Solomatina E.D., et al. POLITICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES OF FORMING INTER-BUDGETARY RELATIONS // Region: Systems, Economics, Management. 2025. Vol. 1, no. 1 (68). P. 99–105. https://doi.org/10.22394/1997-4469-2025-68-1-99-105

How to Cite

Serebryakova N.A., Petrov D.S., Solomatina E.D., et al. POLITICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND ECONOMIC ADVANTAGES OF FORMING INTER-BUDGETARY RELATIONS // Region: Systems, Economics, Management. 2025. Vol. 1, no. 1 (68). P. 99–105. https://doi.org/10.22394/1997-4469-2025-68-1-99-105

References

  1. Банк России. О чем говорят тренды. Макроэкономика и рынки. Бюллетень Департамента исследований и прогнозирования. Апрель 2022 г. https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/40953/bulletin_22-02.pdf.
  2. Бухвальд Е.М. Пространственные аспекты «Концепции 2020» и их реализация / Е.М. Бухвальд // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. — 2021. — № 2. — С. 67—83.
  3. Доржиева В.В. Государственная политика импортозамещения как фактор развития фармацевтической промышленности России: влияние санкций и шаги к успеху / В.В. Доржиева // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. — 2022. — № 6. — С. 68—78.
  4. Смородинская Н.В. Влияние глобальных стоимостных цепочек на национальные экономические системы и вызовы для российской экономической политики / Н.В. Смородинская, Д.Д. Катуков // Общественные науки и современность. — 2017. — № 4. — С. 27—33.
  5. Клепач А.Н. Макроэкономика в условиях гибридной войны / А.Н. Клепач // Научные труды ВЭО России. — 2022. — Т. 235. — С. 63—78.
  6. Махина С.Н. Сущность и системные характеристики политико-правовой категории «децентрализация» в современном демократическом государстве / С.Н. Махина // Государство и право. — 2020. — № 7. — С. 28.
  7. Ушкалова Д.И. Внешняя торговля России в условиях санкционного давления / Д.И. Ушкалова // Журнал новой экономической ассоциации. — № 3 (55). — С. 218—226.
  8. Широв А. Импортозамещение: стратегия и тактика успеха / А. Широв, М. Гусев // Эксперт. — 2022. — № 27. — С. 56—59.
  9. Amagoh F. An Examination of the Impacts of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth / F. Amagoh, A.A. Amin // International Journal of Business Administration. — 2022. — Vol. 3. No. 6. — P. 72—81. — URL: https://doi.org/10.5430/ ijba.v3n6p72 (дата обращения: 01.05.2024).
  10. Baskaran T. Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis / T. Baskaran, L.P. Feld, J. Schnellenbach // Economic Inquiry. — 2016. — Vol. 54. No. 3. — P. 1445—1463. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12331 (дата обращения: 01.05.2024).
  11. Besfamille M. Bailouts in federations: is a hard budget constraint always best? / M. Besfamille, B. Lockwood // International Economic Review. — 2019. — Vol. 49. No. 2. — P. 577—593. — URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00490.x (дата обращения: 01.06.2024).
  12. Bird R.M. Asymmetric Fiscal Decentralization: Glue or Solvent? / R.M. Bird // International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. 2021.
  13. Bird R. An approach to metropolitan governance and finance / R. Bird, E. Slack // Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. — 2022. — Vol. 25. No. 5. — P. 729—755. — URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1068/c0623 (дата обращения: 04.05.2024).
  14. Brennan G. The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution / G. Brennan, J.M. Buchanan // Cambridge University Press. — 2020. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400011971 (дата обращения: 04.05.2024).
  15. Mulder N. The economic weapon: The rise of sanctions as a tool of modern war / N. Mulder. — New Haven : Yale University Press, 2022. — DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv240df1m.
  16. The Bank of Russia. What the trends say. Macroeconomics and markets. Bulletin of the Department of Research and Forecasting. April 2022 https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/40953/bulletin_22-02.pdf .
  17. Buchwald E.M. Spatial aspects of the «2020 Concept» and their implementation / E.M. Buchwald // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — No. 2. — Pp. 67—83.
  18. Dorzhieva V.V. State policy of import substitution as a factor in the development of the pharmaceutical industry in Russia: The impact of sanctions and steps to success / V.V. Dorzhieva // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. — 2022. — No. 6. — Pp. 68—78.
  19. Smorodinskaya N.V. The influence of global value chains on national economic systems and challenges for Russian economic policy / N.V. Smorodinskaya, D.D. Katukov // Social Sciences and Modernity. — 2017. — No. 4. — Pp. 27—33.
  20. Klepach A.N. Macroeconomics in a hybrid war / A.N. Klepach // Scientific papers of the VEO of Russia. — 2022. — Vol. 235. — Pp. 63—78.
  21. Makhina S.N. The essence and systemic characteristics of the political and legal category «decentralization» in a modern democratic state / S.N. Makhina // State and Law. — 2020. — No. 7. — P. 28.
  22. Ushkalova D.I. Russia's foreign Trade under sanctions pressure / D.I. Ushkalova // Journal of the New Economic Association. — No. 3 (55). — Pp. 218—226.
  23. Shirov A. Import substitution: strategy and tactics of success / A. Shirov, M. Gusev // Expert. — 2022. — No. 27. — Pp. 56—59
  24. Amagoh F. An Examination of the Impacts of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth / F. Amagoh, A.A. Amin // International Journal of Business Administration. — 2022. — Vol. 3. No. 6. — P. 72—81. — URL: https://doi.org/10.5430 / ijba.v3n6p72 (accessed: 05/01/2024).
  25. Baskaran T. Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis / T. Baskaran, L.P. Feld, J. Schnellenbach // Economic Inquiry. — 2016. — Vol. 54. No. 3. — P. 1445—1463. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12331 (date of request: 05/01/2024).
  26. Besfamille M. Bailouts in federations: is a hard budget constraint always best? / M. Besfamille, B. Lockwood // International Economic Review. — 2019. — Vol. 49. No. 2. — P. 577—593. — URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00490.x (дата обращения: 01.06.2024).
  27. Bird R.M. Asymmetric Fiscal Decentralization: Glue or Solvent? / R.M. Bird // International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. 2021.
  28. Bird R. An approach to metropolitan governance and finance / R. Bird, E. Slack // Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. — 2022. — Vol. 25. No. 5. — P. 729—755. — URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1068/c0623 (дата обращения: 04.05.2024).
  29. Brennan G. The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution / G. Brennan, J.M. Buchanan // Cambridge University Press. — 2020. — URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400011971 (дата обращения: 04.05.2024).
  30. Mulder N. The economic weapon: The rise of sanctions as a tool of modern war / N. Mulder // New Haven : Yale University Press, 2022. — DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv240df1m.