Статьи
О ДОМИНАНТАХ ПОДХОДОВ К УПРАВЛЕНИЮ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫМИ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИМИ СИСТЕМАМИ
Received: 15.01.2018 Published: 15.01.2018
Full text
Abstract
Studies of the regional economy have a long history. Each stage of research is marked by the appearance of bright works, revealing certain aspects of management, offering effective methods and techniques of management impact aimed at achieving the main goal - to improve the level and quality of life of the population of the region. Of course, in the studies of the regional economy there is continuity and consistency, but for each historical period, for the representatives and founders of different schools and areas characterized by its individual research «Foundation», which is based on reasoning. The authors of this article made an attempt to find the most significant provisions determining certain milestones in the development of ideas about the management of regional economy. The task of the authors was to discover the dominant ap- proaches to the management of regional economic systems and to present some of their theoretical developments made by domestic and foreign authors. The following methods are used to solve this problem: monographic, historical, cognitive analysis, causal modeling, empirical generalization method. The research showed that the main dominant approaches to the management of regional economic systems can be considered: justice, equality, proportionality, competition, stability, bal- ance, integration, clustering, networking, cooperation, structure, and involvement. The sequence of consideration of these categories corresponds to the chronology of their dominance in the research of scientists-regionalists.
Keywords
How to cite
Для цитирования:
Сироткина Н., Шан Я. О ДОМИНАНТАХ ПОДХОДОВ К УПРАВЛЕНИЮ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫМИ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИМИ СИСТЕМАМИ // Регион: системы, экономика, управление. 2018. Т. 40, № 1. С. 24–32.
How to Cite
Сироткина Н., Шан Я. О ДОМИНАНТАХ ПОДХОДОВ К УПРАВЛЕНИЮ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫМИ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИМИ СИСТЕМАМИ // Region: Systems, Economics, Management. 2018. Vol. 40, no. 1. P. 24–32.
