Borisova  O. B.

The relevance of the topic. The article is an original and new attempt to consider innovative development through the prism of the age structure of the elements of the national innovation system. Innovative development is studied from the perspective of the contradictions identified by the authors. At the same time, the identified paradoxes do not become a point of singularity, but serve as a basis for justifying management decisions with prospects for practical implementation. Along with the paradoxes of innovative development, the article raises the issue of the stereotypical behavior of the structural elements of the national innovation system, which is referred to as behavioral «mimicry». By criticizing «mimicry» as a stereotypical behavior observed in various age groups of participants in the national innovation system, the authors highlight the opportunities and threats of innovative development. These developments are used to justify the strategies of innovative development, which are formulated in the form of theses and explanations. The institutional environment for applying the authors' ideas is the cognitive-institutional transformation. The author's novelty lies in the identification and study of this phenomenon, as well as the introduction of the concept of «institutional order» into scientific discourse and the periodization of institutional orders characteristic of the 20th and early 19th centuries. Goal. Research on the paradoxes, stereotypes, and strategies of innovative development, taking into account the age characteristics of the holders of competencies related to the structural elements of the national innovation system, such as research and development organizations, universities, mass media, government and management bodies, drivers of innovative development, innovative infrastructure, and the entrepreneurial sector. Methodology. Methods of logical and comparative analysis, the method of analogies, methods of analysis and synthesis, empirical generalization, the monographic method, the interdisciplinary approach, and the ecosystem and structural approaches. Results and conclusions. Using logical research methods, the method of analogies, structural analysis, and dialectical and interdisciplinary approaches, and relying on theoretical concepts that form the paradigm of modern economics and management, the authors have attempted to scientifically substantiate the prospects for the effective realization of the potential of participants in the national innovation system, taking into account their status and the stereotypical behavior influenced by the dominant age group. Executive government bodies, corporate managers, and leaders of organizations in various sectors of the economy can and should use this information in the development of strategic plans, projects, programs, and recommendations. Scope of application. Economics, organization, and management of the national innovation system, ensuring innovative development, and realizing the innovative potential of the structural elements of the national innovation system in accordance with the current age characteristics of participants in innovative processes.

The relevance of the topic. Humanity exists as long as scientific research is carried out, which is the subject of intellectual efforts and the realization of the creative potential of the main driving force of development - the scientific community. Scientists are the pride of the nation, and the result of their work is the wealth of the country. The state is rich in its scientific schools. The production of new knowledge and its dissemination as a result of pedagogical and teaching activities, training of highly qualified personnel contribute to the growth and development of the national economy. The susceptibility to knowledge and the rooting of scientific concepts in various strata of society are influenced by many factors: timeliness, relevance, usefulness, user value, reproducibility. Scientists who are distinguished by their research talent, have practical skills in solving problems in the «field» conditions and the ability to think strategically are able to form knowledge capital with high consumer attractiveness. There are such scientists in every historical period. The intellectual product produced by them, presented in the form of theoretical developments or practical recommendations, is consumed by the ecosystem, contributing to its evolution. The task of the user (consumer) of scientific developments is to be immersed in scientific reflection. Being aware of progressive views on issues on the current agenda, the knowledge-oriented consumer gets the opportunity for intellectual enrichment and co-creation. Of particular interest is the intellectual product in the form of publications in periodical peer-reviewed scientific journals, which is a reflection of the most acute current research problems. This article is devoted to the analysis of operational developments presented in scientific journals conducted over the past fifteen years on the problem of management of Russian regions. The authorship of the reviewed publications, their subject matter and content allow us to consider them a collection of intellectual developments that reveal progressive views on the problem of developing and implementing management policies for Russian regions. Goal. The study of the process of formation of the paradigm of regional economy management at the turn of the millennium as a result of intellectual rethinking and clarification of certain areas of development and implementation of the management policy of Russian regions in accordance with the conceptual provisions developed by Professor B. G. Preobrazhensky and other representatives of the Voronezh School of Economics. Methodology. Monographic method, method of analogies, methods of analysis and synthesis, empirical generalization, historical and logical approach, graphical method, behavioral and dialectical approaches, structural analysis, systematic approach. Results and conclusions. The institutional transformations and transitions taking place at the turn of the century, which we are witnessing and even providing, contributed to a change in the management paradigm, clarifying previously justified approaches and developing fundamentally new provisions that form the current concepts of management of Russian regions. Among the most significant theoretical constructions of research interest are the provisions of the administrative-command approach to management, liberalization, protectionism, the concept of sustainable development and its variety - the concept of a circular economy, the concept of responsible behavior and the concept of national consolidation. The study and critical analysis of these concepts indicate their increasing importance in an environment where old and new challenges coexist with each other. Despite its high attractiveness to researchers, each of these concepts needs to be updated and scaled to the mesoeconomical level. Having identified the intellectual core of the relevant provisions contained in each concept, we made proposals that reveal the prospects for further developments and (or) their practical implementation. Thus, on the basis of ideas about sustainable development, formed taking into account the progressive views on this problem of B. G. Preobrazhensky, the current provisions of ensuring sustainable regional development in terms of its environmental and innovative components were clarified. Summarizing the scientific heritage on the problems of developing and implementing regional policy in general, the prospects for improving inter-budgetary relations were identified, and recommendations were made in the field of tax regulation. Based on the analysis of the concept of national consolidation, the prospects for innovative improvement of the regional economy are substantiated. The scope of application. Regional development management; state and municipal management; management of sustainable development of the region with primary attention to environmental and innovative aspects of sustainability.

The relevance of the topic. The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the formation of the identity of the economic system under the influence of external influences and taking into account internal disturbances. The «genetic» code of the ecosystem, according to the authors, programs its behavior and determines the prospects for development. In order to effectively manage the development of the ecosystem, it is necessary to try to determine the historical prerequisites for its formation, identify trends and establish patterns of realization of its potential. In the sciences related to economics, the problem of historical justice is raised, i.e. an event (phenomenon, the life of a historical character) that should have happened a long time ago and finally happened. Going beyond this simplified view, the authors have introduced a definition — «the economy of historical justice». Goal. The study of the economics of historical justice by analyzing the process of realization by the system of its potential, limited by the possibilities for self-adjustment and self-organization, the content of which is determined by the dominant «genes», which are social roles, productions and activities that traditionally determine the specialization of the ecosystem. Methodology. Methods of logical and comparative analysis of ecosystem management practices at various levels, the method of analogies, methods of analysis and synthesis, empirical generalization, monographic method. Results and conclusions. Using logical research methods and a dialectical approach, as well as relying on theoretical concepts that form the paradigm of modern economics, sociology and philosophy, the authors attempted a scientific search for historical justice in the relations of economic agents seeking to ensure their development. Based on the logic of rational constructive creative behavior of ecosystem elements, it is established that all of them will strive to implement their «genetic» program. Executive bodies of state power, corporate managers and heads of organizations in various sectors of the economy can and should use this information when developing strategic plans in accordance with the principle of indicative. Scope of application. Management of economic systems of any level of complexity, the structural elements of which interact to ensure their development.